Local charities will not face a “cliff edge,” councillors on Bath & North East Somerset Council have insisted as they passed a budget that spread proposed cuts to charities over two years.
The Guildhall in Bath
As voted through by a full council meeting on Tuesday 20th February, the 2024/25 budget — described by council leader Kevin Guy (Bathavon North, Liberal Democrat) as “not just balanced but boldly ambitious” — will see £5.8m more spent on social care, a £5m investment into council house building, and £2m of income from Bath’s clean air zone spent on a new “Scholar’s Way” cycle route in the south of Bath.
Council cabinet member for resources Mark Elliott (Lansdown, Liberal Democrats) told the meeting: “This is a budget this Lib Dem administration and everyone involved in the budget setting process can be proud of.
“Despite the unprecedented wider crisis in local government funding, it provides stability, it protects the most vulnerable, and it delivers on our promises to residents.”
But the council came under fire for ending free parking in Midsomer Norton and Radstock in the budget, and for telling local charities over Christmas that it would cut £802k from their funding to help the most vulnerable.
Charities warned the move would push more people into rough sleeping and would end up costing the council more in the long run as more people would need to rely on statutory social care services.
Now the planned cut has been spread over two years, with a £400,000 cut to happen this year, and a further £402k to be cut in 2025/26.
Mr Elliott said: “We have talked to them. We have agreed to spread the cost. We have agreed to deal with them directly and talk to them and negotiate with them.
“There is no cliff edge cut in their spending.”
Mr Elliott said that he had given guarantees to the charities and organisations that the council would carry out a systematic review “with them” and not impose things on them.
He added: “We are also not in the business of shooting ourselves in the foot.
“Where services can be shown to be saving the council money by preventing people calling on council-run services, those services will obviously not be cut.
“If it turns out that the savings we’ve proposed really aren’t achievable when assessed in that way, then so be it.
“But we spend over £9m on over 40 contracts in this space, and they haven’t been looked at for quite some time, so it seems reasonable to think that some savings can be made.”
Kate Morton, CEO of mental health charity Bath Mind, said: “At least we’ve got two years.”
She said she was reassured by the commitment that had been given, although added: “But we need to hold them to that. We need to hold them to account.”
Other money-saving and income-generation measures in the budget will see council tax increase by the maximum 4.99%, of which two percentage points will be ring-fenced for spending on adult social care, and reduced opening hours at the Bath and Welton (Radstock) recycling centres.
Mr Elliott also defended the council’s plans to end free parking in the Somer Valley, insisting it is “the right thing to do”.
The move has faced opposition from local councillors and shopkeepers who have warned it will “kill the town”.
Mr Elliott said: “We are investing £3.5m in Midsomer Norton High Street. We are not leaving Midsomer Norton bereft. There is much work going on there. But the unfairness of having one area that has got free parking when the rest of the area doesn’t is not sound.”
An amendment from the Labour opposition on the council had proposed spreading the cut to charity services across four years, along with a host of other alternative spending and savings proposals including buying ten digital advertising screens to raise revenue instead of ending free parking in the Somer Valley.
Liz Hardman (Labour, Paulton) said the proposals were “a prudent use of finances”.
But Mr Elliott said that if they were serious proposals they should have been brought forward earlier through the council scrutiny process.
He said: “This is a hodgepodge of various suggestions which we have to vote on as a block.”
An amendment from the Green group, calling for the council to invest £200k into “school streets” — where roads by schools are closed at school run times to encourage walking to school — and to scrap Bath councillor’s free parking permits for council business, was also dismissed as a last minute “stunt” by Mr Elliott.
Green group leader Joanna Wright (Green, Lambridge) said she had been told last year the council was looking at school streets but none had yet been delivered.
But Mr Elliott said he had already recently signed off spending on £250k from the clear air zone reserve on school streets.
He said: “It’s already going to happen; it’s signed off. It’s happening this year.”
The amendments from the Labour and Green groups were both voted down.
John Wimperis, Local Democracy Reporter
